• Blog
  • July 16th, 2018

The real problem is excessive military spending by the USA

where-your-tax-dollar-goes.png

The usually hawkish Globe and Mail has a commentary by columnist Lawrence Martin that gets it right this time — rather than NATO members being guilty of spending too little on defence, the real problem is the obscene level of overspending by the USA.

Martin notes first that, even without taking into account the American contribution, NATO members collectively currently spend almost four times that of Russia.  When you add in the outsized American contribution, that figure jumps to twelve times as much.

Says Martin:

No NATO country has been attacked by the Russians under Mr. Putin. Given the [NATO] alliance’s military superiority and the commitment of members to defend one another, it would be senseless for him to do so. He’s a lot of things. He isn’t senseless.

And let us not forget that Canada, in June 2017, announced a whopping 70% increase in defence spending over the next ten years, an increase denounced as excessive in previous Ceasefire.ca blogs here and here.

And let us further recall that, even before this latest gargantuan increase, the Department of National Defence had been unable to spend its annual allocation, averaging 1 billion in lapsed funds for the past ten years. And the figure has more than doubled for 2017, with $2.3 billion in funds unspent.

Under the new Liberal accounting rules, however, the monies don’t go back to general revenues but stay with DND, so we can expect the 2018 figure for unspent funds to be even higher.  In the view of RI President Peggy Mason:

As we have repeatedly stated, why should DND even be considered for budgetary increases, when they are manifestly incapable of spending the sums already allocated?

But back to Trump’s absurd demand that NATO commit to a new target of 4% of GDP.  In an online CBC article, Peter Armstrong notes that, for Canada, this would amount to $60 billion. And to reach that level would, in turn, require huge cuts in social services or an equally huge tax hike. He concludes:

Consider what an additional $60 billion would buy us: 46,000 affordable housing units or 6,500 new water-treatment plants in First Nations communities or 180 Super Hornet fighter jets. It’s all about priorities.

For the full Globe and Mail article click: No, Trump, your allies aren’t deliquent on defence spending (Lawrence Martin, 12 July 2018).

For the full CBC article click: Sure, we could spend 4% of GDP on the military — with huge cuts or tax hikes  (Peter Armstrong, CBC.ca, 13 July 2018).

For further information on global military spending including the significant decline in Russia levels, see: Global military spending remains high at $17 trillion (SIPRI, 2 May 2018).

Photo credit: Department of Finance, Canada via CBC.ca

Read More


Leave a Reply




Let’s make it clear to Saudi Arabia that bullying will not work

The RideauInstitute.ca  is on a short summer break, back next Friday 24 August. However, in the meantime, why not show your support to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for standing up to the Saudi Arabian bully boy, Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, by sending an email to: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau at: pm@pm.gc.ca Foreign Minister Chrystia […]

Read More
View the Blog »

Prime Minister Trudeau, bold steps are needed on global nuclear disarmament

The 73rd anniversaries of the terrible atomic bombings of Hiroshima, on 6 August, and Nagasaki, on 9 August, have just ...

National Defence Committee calls for Canadian action on nuclear disarmament

Photo credit: wagingpeace.org (Setsuko Thurlow giving 2017 Nobel Peace Prize address) On 18 June 2018 the House of Commons Standing Committee ...