• Blog
  • April 9th, 2018

Minister Goodale: Bill C-59 needs further amendments

Rideau image

Bill C-59 was supposed to fix the myriad problems created by its predecessor, the infamous  Bill C-51, now Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Act, 2015.  Not so say civil society leaders Micheal Vonn and Tim McSorely:

“Canadians were told that the new law would fix the old law. Instead, we got a bill that nominally addresses some concerns, but exploits the opportunity to introduce more radical new powers for national security agencies.”

That is why a broad array of civil liberties and human rights organizations including the Rideau Institute have signed a statement outlining the most troubling aspects of Bill C-59 under three headings:

  1. New legal thresholds effectively legalize mass surveillance;
  2. The practical impossibility of an individual effectively challenging their inclusion on the “no-fly list” continues; and
  3. Canada’s “NSA”, the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) is authorized to conduct cyberattacks.

Legalized mass surveillance:

“Bill C-59 … expressly empowers mass surveillance through the collection of bulk data and suspiciously non-defined “publically available” data. The terrible irony is that this means instead of reining in mass surveillance, the new oversight bodies will be giving an official seal of approval to mass surveillance.”  – Civil Society letter

No Fly List

The no-fly list has never been shown to increase aviation safety. Yet, Bill C-59 perpetuates a scheme that severely limits the legal right of “due process” based on a mere suspicion of “dangerousness” that cannot be effectively challenged in a fair and open process. Instead, the only recourse is a deeply unfair, secret court process, where information favourable to the listed individual may actually be withheld by government lawyers.

Legalized Cyberattacks

“We are seeing our “intelligence” agencies transformed in dangerous directions. C-59 continues to allow CSIS active “disruption” powers and now also gives Canada’s signals intelligence agency (CSE) new powers to use cyber-attacks against foreign individuals, states, organizations or terrorist groups.  This would include hacking, deploying malware, and “disinformation campaigns”. – Civil Society Statement

State-sponsored hacking carries enormous risks of unleashing malware that can wreak havoc far beyond the intended target. There is a also the fundamental conflict of interest when the agency mandated to protect our cyber infrastructure is “powerfully incentivised” to “hide and hoard” security vulnerabilities to use in its own cyberattacks.

“We need a public discussion about what threats these attack powers are meant to address and what new threats they may open us up to if a Canadian attack results in cyberwar escalation.” – Civil Society Statement

 Click here for the full text of the Civil Society Statement on Bill C-59.


Photo credit: Sarah Davies

Read More

Leave a Reply

The real problem is excessive military spending by the USA

The usually hawkish Globe and Mail has a commentary by columnist Lawrence Martin that gets it right this time — rather than NATO members being guilty of spending too little on defence, the real problem is the obscene level of overspending by the USA. Martin notes first that, even without taking into account the American […]

Read More
View the Blog »

NATO leaders should champion nuclear restraint and dialogue

   Presidents Reagan and Gorbachev at 1987 Washington Summit Our previous blog called on Prime Minister Trudeau to resist Trump’s bullying ...

Trudeau must hold the line again at upcoming NATO Summit.

In a 25 June statement, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced that he would travel to Brussels, Belgium, to attend the ...