• Blog
  • May 29th, 2017

Trump pressures Canada to double defence spending

Family portrait of NATO Heads of State and Government

U.S. President Donald Trump tried to dress down fellow NATO members for not spending enough on their armed forces in a speech at the NATO summit on Thursday.

Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the second-ranking Democrat in the House of Representatives, condemned the President’s comments:

“I was appalled by his condescending remarks to NATO leaders today, which were an embarrassment for our country.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau responded by defending Canada’s record in the organization, while asserting that he will not be increasing Canada’s presence in Iraq or sending troops back to Afghanistan:

“We have no troops in Afghanistan at this time, but we are happy to be supportive in other ways.”

President Trump claims that “23 of 28 members are not paying what they should be paying and what they are supposed to be paying for their defence.” In response, the PM maintained that Canada is actively engaged in the fight against terrorism and is supporting NATO in other ways, including through intelligence-gathering by the Communications Security Establishment.

Rideau Institute President Peggy Mason noted that:

“For Canada to do Trump’s bidding and meet the NATOaspirational targetof 2% GDP, it would have to double defence spending from $18.7 billion to just over $40 billion. This is an enormous sum, and many Canadians believe that this money would be better spent on various social, environmental, peacebuilding, and humanitarian programs.”

With the long-awaited defence policy review due to be released on June 7th, we will soon find out whether Canada will continue to stand strong in the face of external pressures to increase our national defence budget. Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan’s assertion that “The defence policy was done by and for Canadians” will be put to the test…

Photo credit: NATO

Read More


Leave a Reply




Offensive Cyber Operations Endanger Us All

There is increasing debate and concern over the actions of states and non-state actors alike in the cyber domain.  Annegret Bendiek and Ben Wagner, associates of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP), outline key challenges and the dubious utility of offensive cyber operations in their article Making states responsible for their activities […]

Read More
View the Blog »

Nuclear Dangers and How to Dispel Them

Now, after thirty years of an apparent easing of nuclear tensions since the end of the cold war, fear of ...

Paul Rogers: Dangerous Signals in Trump’s State of the Union Address

In this trenchant analysis, Professor Paul Rogers, who has been cataloguing the manifest failures of the “war on terror" since ...