• Blog
  • September 29th, 2015

Harper’s foreign engagement more posturing than policy

In a brilliant article, the last Canadian Ambassador to sit on the UN Security Council, Paul Heinbecker, convincingly explodes the Conservative hype of “international statesmanship and principled policy, of economic action plans and historic trade agreements, of a rediscovered warrior spirit and newfound hard-nosed diplomacy.” (“Foreign Posturing: How does Harper’s foreign policy stack up?“, Literary Review of Canada, October 2015).

Heinbecker writes:

Harper made ideological and idiosyncratic policy choices that put him at odds with nearly all his predecessors, and most contemporary allies, and that left Canada on the margins of global relevance. His government’s deprecation of the UN, his snubbing of its General Debates, his disposition to sit in stern, often self-serving judgement of others won us few friends and, along with his irresponsibility on climate change, neglect of traditional development partners in Africa, and unquestioning support of the Netanyahu government in Israel and disregard for the Palestinians, lost us the first election to the Security Council after a string of six straight wins over six decades….

As a consequence of inexperience or opportunism or both, the Harper government has turned foreign policy outside in. Rather than seeing it as the projection abroad of Canadian national purposes distilled from Canadian values and interests, it has treated foreign affairs often as a means to cultivate diaspora communities and constituencies at home….Foreign posture has replaced foreign policy. Oh Canada.”

 

To read the full article, together with several others in this special foreign policy issue of the Literary Review of Canada, click here: Foreign Posturing: How does Harper’s foreign policy stack up?

Read More

Comments are closed.




Lifting the veil on American foreign policy: Part One

The absolute irony of the Trump presidency is that he is inadvertently exposing the terrible hypocrisies underlying an extremely hawkish American foreign policy consensus that in many ways does not serve America’s national interests well, if at all. – Peggy Mason, President of the Rideau Institute Backed by ferociously powerful domestic lobbies, America’s blind support […]

Read More
View the Blog »

Trump’s dangerous bluster on Iran

Iran has been formally PUT ON NOTICE for firing a ballistic missile. Should have been thankful for the terrible deal ...

Invisible wars in the Age of Trump

[caption id="attachment_6663" align="aligncenter" width="1024"] [/caption] Paul Rogers warns that the near invisibility of modern warfare will make democratic accountability in the ...